Dear Friends,
In the talk Compassion, Karuna, Jill says, “compassion is what flowers when metta, or goodwill, comes into contact with dukkha, with suffering.”
Today, we’ll follow Jill’s unpacking of suffering, and then tomorrow look at the how-to of compassion.
The term dukkha is often translated as suffering, but it has a much broader sense of the term than what we might think of (capital-S) Suffering. You only have to turn on the news or scroll through a Twitter feed to see the immensity of tragedy and pain – fires, floods, accidents, war, pandemic, illness, death, racism, climate crisis, … Yikes. So it can feel kind of petty that here I am, in relative safety, with privileges that many others would only dream of having, feeling a little bit annoyed that the cucumber in the fridge went soft the day after I bought it. Yet that too can be a type of dukkha.
Jill reads a passage from the Buddha, translated by Thanissarro Bhikkhu, and then explains a bit:
Thanissaro translates dukkha as stress: Birth is stressful. Aging is stressful. Death is stressful. Sorrow, lamentation, pain, distress, and despair are stressful. Association with unloved is stressful. Separation from the loved is stressful. Not getting what is wanted is stressful. In short, the five clinging aggregates are stressful.
I just want to highlight that – pretty obvious – birth, aging, and death is stressful. Having to be with what we don’t like, having to be separated from what we do like, certainly not getting what we want is stressful. And elsewhere in the teachings, the Buddha used this same word dukkha in relation to more subtly unpleasant aspects of experience. …
So the Pali word dukkha covers a very broad range of different types of suffering, from the most extreme anguish on one end through to just that subtle slightly existential sense of discomfort or unease.
So again, because we’re born as human beings, because we have vulnerable bodies, vulnerable hearts, vulnerable minds, we are going to experience some degree of dukkha. That’s just a fact. But on top of that basic dukkha, we usually add a whole pile of extra dukkha in the form of our reactivity to it.
As we explore the feeling tone, vedana, of experience, we learn some of the habitual reactivity that’s in our systems – pleasant – want – oh, but I didn’t get it or it didn’t stay – dukkha. Unpleasant – don’t want – ugh, but there it is – dukkha.
Right, so we know reactivity. So now what?
In our meditation and mindfulness practice, we can learn ways to find a bit more space between the sense experience and the reactivity – and that can help release the suffering. But that’s hard to do when there are deadlines and pets to feed and everything else. And this is where compassion comes in – it can help support a wiser relationship to dukkha. More on that tomorrow!
For today, it could be interesting to gently look at suffering of any kind and how we relate to it. And see if there a little moments of release or ease when we can be less reactive.
In the following recording, Gil Fronsdal leads a meditation (after a brief discussion) on “Non-Resistance to Suffering”
https://www.audiodharma.org/talks/12583
With gentle wishes,
Andrea
I really appreciated Jill Shepherd’s pointing out how developing greater compassion goes hand-in-hand with developing wisdom. I wonder if there is more that can be said about that? Are there any sutras that emphasize that? Thanks again! G.
Hi Geralyne. I don’t know many sutta references – this might be a question for Jeanne. 🙂
That said, in the book “Compassion and Emptiness” by Analayo, he references a sutta (AN 4.186) where the Buddha distinguishes between penetrative wisdom and vast or great wisdom. Analayo explains the vast or great wisdom finds its expression by being motivated by compassion. “This clearly points to a close relationship between the four noble truths and compassion as two complementary facets of wisdom, which should be penetrative as well as vast.”
Analayo’s book can be read online here
https://www.buddhismuskunde.uni-hamburg.de/pdf/5-personen/analayo/compassionemptiness.pdf
See printed page 12/PDF page 24 for this specific reference.
Hope that helps!
I forgot to mention that I found Jeanne’s “Mindfulness and Quiet Joy” also very helpful! This is a meditation that I could practice often. G.
AG . I know we are committed to a Buddhist way of talking and thinking and I accept that but the other traditions do offer us different perspectives on the same concepts.
According to Taoism the world is perfect. It cannot be added or taken away from. Every moment. Every being. Every eventuality. Every unfolding. My response to the moment is imbricate in every aspect of that moment but there is no way to change or alter that moment. It is part of the perfection.
Some day I would sincerely like to compare the seven deadly sins of my former Spiritual practice to the five hindrances. The seven deadly sins ( Gluttony, Lust, Sloth, envy, avarice,Ire and Pride) cause all suffering and in fact are the suffering. Of these seven deadly sins , Pride is by far the worse. The Sin of Pride is the Sin of thinking I know better about the way the Creation should be created.
That is, the suffering of Pride comes from thinking that the Creation is not perfect that it should be another way. That I know better. Can I find the way of easing back in the easy chair and saying with gentle conviction the Creation is complete. It cannot be added to or taken away from. I accept it as it is. Just as I am
RND